Death Penalty – Justified?
Whoever claims that the deprivation of life is a justified approach to dealing with individuals, might have lost a certain sense of humanity. However, we, as socially responsible individuals and as people capable of realizing the good and bad features of a legal system, are well aware that human rights protection is what we all rely upon in different situations – when having an immigration dna test, when signing an employment contract and even when peaking into the neighbor’s house. Then how can their gross violation be justified in a fact of taking a life away.
True, a justification is that a murder, who took life, deserves to be treated the same way. But this is a rather emotional approach to the matter. If you need to punish someone, you do not simply kill him, you do not even have to change him – you can simply take away his liberty. Being locked up is worse than dieing – the reason is a psychological because being unable to exercise yourself as an individuals leads to the assumption of a pointless life.
This is the main reason why the imposition of liabilities such as 230 years of prison is more reasonable than the electric chair. People with more serious crimes than murder, because such exists, need not be treated differently. A punishment enough is a deprivation of liberty. However, taking life away is messing up with another type of laws – the laws of proclaiming power over the significance of human life. If a country kills for a killing, this means it would respond to a provocation with a provocation. Where is the personal peace going then, and what would be the aspirations of such a country as the majority of people fear to commit a crime not because they will harm but because they will die?
Similar Posts:
Tories Stories : Well we all wanted this glorious, amazingly…
Truth Hurts : And while many people tend to believe that N…
Tips for buying cheap flights : …
February Sees Record U.S. Federal Budget Deficit : I was in…